Skip to main content
Glama

nuclei

Run template-based scans to detect security vulnerabilities in web applications and networks.

Instructions

Fast vulnerability scanner with templates

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYes
session_idYes
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only mentions speed ('fast'), but fails to disclose potential destructiveness, permissions, or other behavioral traits for a vulnerability scanner.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (4 words), which is underspecification rather than conciseness. It does not earn its brevity as it omits critical information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 2 required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is woefully incomplete. It fails to convey essential details for a security scanning tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation for the 'url' and 'session_id' parameters, leaving the agent without guidance on how to populate them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a vulnerability scanner using templates, which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from siblings by mentioning templates, though it lacks explicit web context from the URL parameter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like nikto, nmap, or sqlmap. No context about prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MohitSahoo/MCPToolForWebVulnerabilities-'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server