WiFi PCAP Analyzer MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to WiFi PCAP Analyzer MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables Wireshark-like PCAP analysis through tshark, providing tools for filtering packets, extracting protocol fields, drilling down into frames, session tracking, and timeline analysis for troubleshooting 5G, IMS/SIP, and network protocol issues.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLM-based assistants to diagnose network problems from PCAP/PCAPNG packet captures, offering tools for capture summaries, TCP conversation analysis, security anomaly detection, and JSON-RPC extraction without requiring Wireshark.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables local LLM clients to capture and analyze network traffic using Wireshark's CLI tools, providing packet summaries, protocol hierarchies, conversations, endpoints, expert info, and stream reassembly without shell access.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language analysis of network packet captures, including protocol detection, flow analysis, and security threat identification, integrated with AI assistants.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceBridges AI assistants with network packet analysis, enabling PCAP investigation, protocol discovery, packet filtering, stream analysis, and live capture through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to load and analyze PCAP/PCAPNG files using Wireshark's sharkd interface, supporting packet inspection, traffic structure, conversations, and protocol statistics through natural language.3076MIT
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
Most tools are clearly separated into lifecycle, metadata, and packet-retrieval roles, and the descriptions are detailed about input types. However, dissect_packet and get_packet_by_number are explicit aliases, and several TCP/DNS retrieval tools overlap enough to create misselection risk.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern with predictable prefixes like load_, get_, set_, and filter_. Singular/plural noun choices are consistent with the returned data, and even the redundant get_packet_by_number is name-consistent.
At 23 tools, the server sits in the heavy 16-25 range and is borderline appropriate for a full PCAP analyzer. The count is defensible given the breadth of metadata, validation, and Wi-Fi-specific retrieval features, but the duplicate dissection tool and overlapping retrieval variants mean it could be trimmed without losing capability.
The server covers capture lifecycle, decryption-key configuration, export, metadata and statistics, validation, timeline analysis, generic filtering, per-frame dissection, and Wi-Fi-specific client/AP/transaction views. No major operational gap is apparent for file-based WiFi packet-capture analysis.