linux-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to linux-mcp
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform controlled Linux system administration tasks like reading logs, managing services, cron jobs, WordPress, and executing sandboxed Python code, with strict security constraints.292GPL 2.0
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for system monitoring, enabling users to ask about CPU, memory, disk, network, and processes on their system.93MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Linux and macOS system administration, diagnostics, and troubleshooting, supporting remote SSH execution and multi-host management.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Linux system monitoring and OS algorithm simulation, exposing tools for memory, filesystem, process, and CPU scheduling observations.12MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA powerful MCP server for reading and modifying Linux /proc filesystem values, providing system monitoring, process management, and sysctl operations via JSON-RPC and SSE.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for remote Linux/Unix server management via SSH, enabling command execution, system monitoring, file operations, and diagnostics through natural language.341MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA real-time system diagnostics MCP server that gives AI agents live access to CPU, RAM, disk, network, processes, and hardware health metrics, with zero cloud dependency.7-
TDQS
Scored across 65 tools
Tools cover many overlapping domains (CPU, memory, disk, network, process, Docker, etc.), but descriptions explicitly cross-reference alternatives (e.g., 'for X use Y'), making most selections clear. A few clusters such as process info/tree/fds and disk usage/inode/block devices still require careful reading to avoid misselection.
Almost all tool names use snake_case with a consistent get_<noun> pattern. The only exceptions are ping_host and resolve_dns, which use action verbs instead of get_, a minor deviation but still readable and consistent in casing.
With 65 tools, the surface is far beyond the typical well-scoped range (3-15) and exceeds the 50+ threshold for extreme mismatch. Even for a broad Linux diagnostics server, the set includes overlapping utilities (e.g., multiple process, disk, and network tools) that could be consolidated or scoped more tightly.
The read-only diagnostic surface is exceptionally comprehensive, covering system info, hardware, storage, network, Docker, systemd, security, logs, users, packages, and processes. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no sysctl/kernel parameter read, no partition table detail, no arbitrary file-content inspection), but agents can work around most of these.