Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to linux-mcp

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to perform controlled Linux system administration tasks like reading logs, managing services, cron jobs, WordPress, and executing sandboxed Python code, with strict security constraints.
    29
    2
    GPL 2.0

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server for system monitoring, enabling users to ask about CPU, memory, disk, network, and processes on their system.
    9
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server for Linux and macOS system administration, diagnostics, and troubleshooting, supporting remote SSH execution and multi-host management.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A powerful MCP server for reading and modifying Linux /proc filesystem values, providing system monitoring, process management, and sysctl operations via JSON-RPC and SSE.
    14
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for remote Linux/Unix server management via SSH, enabling command execution, system monitoring, file operations, and diagnostics through natural language.
    34
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A real-time system diagnostics MCP server that gives AI agents live access to CPU, RAM, disk, network, processes, and hardware health metrics, with zero cloud dependency.
    7
    -

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 69 tools

Disambiguation3/5

There are several clusters where tools can be confused, such as get_docker_info vs get_docker_system_info vs get_docker_system_snapshot, get_disk_io_metrics vs get_io_stats, and get_system_snapshot vs get_system_health_check vs get_system_info. The descriptions do a good job of cross-referencing and clarifying each tool's niche, but the sheer volume of similar get_* names increases the chance of misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

The vast majority of tools follow a predictable get_<subject> lowercase snake_case pattern, making the surface scannable. The exceptions are few and minor: check_updates, ping_host, and resolve_dns break the strict get_ prefix but still use clear verb_noun naming.

Tool Count2/5

69 tools is far beyond the 25+ threshold and creates a heavy selection surface for an agent. While each tool is individually targeted, the count feels like multiple specialized diagnostic servers merged into one rather than a tightly scoped MCP server.

Completeness4/5

The read-only diagnostic scope is covered unusually well: system, storage, network, Docker, security, boot, processes, packages, logs, and hardware are all represented. The main gaps are package manager support being limited to pacman/dpkg (fatal on rpm/dnf) and several tools depending on optional binaries like iostat, smartctl, or pidstat.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues