Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to infomaniak-mcp-agent

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Agency-grade MCP server for WordPress Elementor — multi-site management for 120+ WordPress sites with safe edits (backup + auto-rollback + post-write verification), template export/import, global widget detection, CSS flush, WP-CLI escape hatch, and headless Chrome screenshots. 34 tools across pages, widgets, templates, bulk find/replace, and fleet operations.
    34
    83 npm
    3
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables agentic administration of Infomaniak accounts via Claude, offering 169 tools for web hosting, mail, domains, DNS, and more, with a strict two-phase commit for safe mutations.
    100
    1 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that lets any MCP-capable agent spawn and drive Claude Code sessions — effectively turning Claude Code into an orchestratable sub-agent fleet.
    59 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    556-tool MCP server giving AI agents full access to the FutureSense business platform. Covers 10 app domains: invoicing, payroll, accounting, CRM, booking, content creation, website builder, quotations, email, and more. Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible client.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Exposes a governed suite of 38 tools over one OAuth-gated MCP endpoint, letting web-based AI clients such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Grok read and edit files, run whitelisted shell commands, search content, use Git, inspect SQLite databases and localhost APIs, automate browsers, manage background tasks, and control Postman. It runs locally with a tailnet or public ingress so browser-based chats can act on your own machine without granting unrestricted shell access.
    -

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 74 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target a clearly distinct Infomaniak resource and action, and the consistent prefix makes them easy to scan. A few close pairs exist — get_my_profile vs get_my_security, get_domain vs get_domain_full, get_mailbox_info vs get_mailbox_full — so agents may need to read descriptions carefully before selecting.

Naming Consistency3/5

A majority of tools follow infomaniak_<verb>_<noun>, and all names are readable snake_case. However, DNS tools invert this pattern (dns_create_record vs create_mailbox), Node.js tools use mixed noun-first forms (nodejs_app_status vs get_nodejs_app), and a few names like overview, help, short_urls_quota, and api_call do not follow the verb_noun convention.

Tool Count1/5

74 tools is far beyond the moderate range and exceeds even the 50+ extreme threshold. The broad Infomaniak product suite partly explains the count, but this should be split into product-scoped servers or significantly consolidated, because the current surface imposes a very large selection burden on an agent.

Completeness3/5

There is good lifecycle coverage for DNS, certificates, databases, mailboxes, and several create/list/delete workflows, and infomaniak_api_call provides an escape hatch for missing public API operations. Still, obvious gaps exist: no update/reset for mailbox or hosting users, no delete for short URLs, no alias deletion for mailboxes, and kDrive/VPS areas are entirely read-only. These gaps will require workarounds for common management tasks.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessUnresponsive