Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to infomaniak-mcp-agent

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Agency-grade MCP server for WordPress Elementor — multi-site management for 120+ WordPress sites with safe edits (backup + auto-rollback + post-write verification), template export/import, global widget detection, CSS flush, WP-CLI escape hatch, and headless Chrome screenshots. 34 tools across pages, widgets, templates, bulk find/replace, and fleet operations.
    34
    62 npm
    3
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables agentic administration of Infomaniak accounts via Claude, offering 169 tools for web hosting, mail, domains, DNS, and more, with a strict two-phase commit for safe mutations.
    100
    8 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    556-tool MCP server giving AI agents full access to the FutureSense business platform. Covers 10 app domains: invoicing, payroll, accounting, CRM, booking, content creation, website builder, quotations, email, and more. Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible client.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Agent-native hosting: your agent deploys any folder to a live URL in one command — no account, no dashboard, no CAPTCHA — and hands the human a link plus a plain-language summary. Full deploy lifecycle as MCP tools (deploy, verify, logs, inspect, rollback), production approval human-only; static sites and full Node.js apps, open source (Apache-2.0).
    13
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Chrome extension + MCP server. Lets coding agents (Claude Code, Codex CLI) drive your real Chrome — sessions intact, 2FA stays with the user. 26 browser tools: form fill on React/CodeMirror/Monaco, privileged fetch that bypasses page CSP, authenticated downloads, in-extension docx parsing. Battle-tested by 400+ hours of real agentic browser work before public v0.9 release.
    42 npm
    2
    MIT

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 74 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target a clearly distinct Infomaniak resource and action, and the consistent prefix makes them easy to scan. A few close pairs exist — get_my_profile vs get_my_security, get_domain vs get_domain_full, get_mailbox_info vs get_mailbox_full — so agents may need to read descriptions carefully before selecting.

Naming Consistency3/5

A majority of tools follow infomaniak_<verb>_<noun>, and all names are readable snake_case. However, DNS tools invert this pattern (dns_create_record vs create_mailbox), Node.js tools use mixed noun-first forms (nodejs_app_status vs get_nodejs_app), and a few names like overview, help, short_urls_quota, and api_call do not follow the verb_noun convention.

Tool Count1/5

74 tools is far beyond the moderate range and exceeds even the 50+ extreme threshold. The broad Infomaniak product suite partly explains the count, but this should be split into product-scoped servers or significantly consolidated, because the current surface imposes a very large selection burden on an agent.

Completeness3/5

There is good lifecycle coverage for DNS, certificates, databases, mailboxes, and several create/list/delete workflows, and infomaniak_api_call provides an escape hatch for missing public API operations. Still, obvious gaps exist: no update/reset for mailbox or hosting users, no delete for short URLs, no alias deletion for mailboxes, and kDrive/VPS areas are entirely read-only. These gaps will require workarounds for common management tasks.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive