Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mind-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes a personal markdown-based second brain (Obsidian-style) as an MCP server, enabling agents to search, read, and write notes with privacy controls.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides file system operations (list, read, write, search) via MCP, enabling an AI agent to manage files through natural language.
      681 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes one or more documentation folders (Markdown, MDX, TXT) to AI agents, enabling listing, reading, and searching of documentation files.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a file-first personal memory layer for AI agents, enabling them to store and retrieve memories as markdown files with an SQLite index. The MCP server offers read-only search by default, with optional write tools for manual memory addition and conflict resolution.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables AI agents to securely read, write, search, and edit JSON and Markdown files through a gated permission-scoped interface with configurable access modes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Turn any folder into a searchable knowledge base for AI, exposed via MCP.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing, reading, writing proposals, searching, and retrieving routing tables. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the 'mind_verb' pattern with snake_case, including 'mind_propose_write' which uses a compound verb. The naming is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for memory/context management. It covers listing, reading, writing proposals, searching, and routing without being too sparse or excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers core operations but lacks delete or direct update tools. However, the proposal-based workflow may compensate, leaving only minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues