Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
arXiv MCP Server

arXiv MCP Server

by Mnehmos
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

get_paper

Retrieve detailed information about a specific academic paper using its arXiv ID, including metadata and content extraction from PDFs.

Instructions

Get details about a specific paper by its arXiv ID

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "paper_id": "<paper_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_paper"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
paper_idYesarXiv paper ID (e.g., 2104.13478 or cs/0001001)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states it 'Get details' but doesn't specify what details are returned (e.g., metadata, abstract, authors), whether it's a read-only operation, potential rate limits, error handling for invalid IDs, or authentication needs. This leaves significant gaps for an AI agent to understand the tool's behavior beyond basic purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that efficiently conveys the core purpose without unnecessary words. It's front-loaded with the main action ('Get details'), making it easy to parse. There's zero waste, and every part of the sentence earns its place by specifying the resource and key input.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It lacks details on what 'details' include, which is crucial since there's no output schema to define the return values. For a tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should provide more behavioral context to be fully helpful for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'paper_id' fully documented in the schema as 'arXiv paper ID (e.g., 2104.13478 or cs/0001001)'. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, such as format constraints or examples. Given the high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate, as the description doesn't compensate but doesn't need to heavily.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Get details') and resource ('specific paper'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It specifies retrieval by arXiv ID, which distinguishes it from general search tools. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like get_paper_content, which might retrieve different aspects of papers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention sibling tools like get_paper_content (which might retrieve content vs. metadata), search_by_category, or search_papers (which handle broader queries). There's no context about prerequisites, such as needing a specific paper ID rather than searching by other criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools