Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mcp-template

mcp-template

by Miyamura80
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-template

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCPs

      mrzys
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes remote, agent-facing MCP endpoints over Streamable HTTP for web search, webpage parsing, local knowledge-base retrieval and document creation, and delegation of tasks to configurable LLM providers. Also bundles an admin console with onboarding, provider/model configuration, API-key management, and call logging.
      MIT

    • Graft

      schrepa
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables building agent-ready APIs that expose tools as both HTTP and MCP endpoints from a single server definition, with automatic OpenAPI, discovery docs, and interactive API reference.
      5
      Apache 2.0

    • fast-mcp

      Manas-maker
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns existing FastAPI routes and custom Python functions into MCP tools, exposing them over ASGI, SSE, or stdio so desktop and chat AI clients can call them with native dependency-injected auth, progressive tool discovery, and self-correcting error responses. It also serves interactive in-chat HTML/JS widgets and a built-in browser inspector for testing tools without external CLIs.
      MIT

    • mcpgate

      SlateGitOrg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes any number of upstream MCP servers (stdio subprocesses or Streamable HTTP endpoints) as one MCP server for LLM agents, with namespaced tool names so servers cannot shadow each other. Every tool call passes centralized OAuth 2.1 bearer validation, per-client tool RBAC, rate limits, JSON Schema argument checks, a hash-chained audit log, and tool-definition pinning that quarantines changed tools until an operator approves them.
      MIT

    • mcpgate

      VirajVShetty
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to access multiple stdio or Streamable HTTP MCP servers through one authenticated endpoint, enforcing OAuth bearer validation, per-client tool RBAC, rate limits, schema validation, audit logging, and tool-definition pinning.
      MIT

    • WhitePact

      Guruprasath-Annadurai
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.
      30
      -
    Deploy Server
    Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 58 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    Many tools are near-duplicates: webhook_unsubscribe vs settings.unsubscribe, gmail_inbox.mark_read vs gmail_mark_thread_read, gmail_composer.send vs gmail_send, gmail_inbox.reply vs gmail_reply_to_thread. An agent cannot reliably tell which is canonical, leading to misselection.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Names mix snake_case with dot-namespaced variants (gmail_composer.save_draft, settings.unsubscribe) and use inconsistent prefixes (gmail_ vs inbox_ vs pdf_ vs webhook_). There is no single predictable pattern, though domain prefixes provide some readability.

    Tool Count1/5

    58 tools is excessive for this server; many are redundant aliases, so the count is inflated by duplication rather than distinct capabilities. This far exceeds a well-scoped tool set.

    Completeness4/5

    Core domains (Gmail draft/thread lifecycle, attachments, PDF signing, webhooks, settings) are broadly covered with create/get/update/send/delete operations. Minor gaps like direct email send or label management exist, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources