planist-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to planist-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-aware AI clients to read a team's docs, decisions, and step-by-step workflows and to propose or commit changes, so agents answer from live organizational context rather than training data.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to publish markdown as shareable pages with permanent links, update existing pages in place, and read or manage page content, versions, and collections through MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to discover, read, search, draft, and edit pages on a locally owned Bludit CMS site, with human-controlled approval and revision checks before changes are applied.GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and Cursor to discover node types, author and validate typed multi-agent workflow files, launch runs against a workspace, and retrieve run status, node outputs, and workspace change details.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects MCP-compatible AI clients to landing-page intelligence, evidence packs, improvement suggestions, experiment drafting and review, preview scans, instrumentation validation, site configuration, and integrations. Customer-facing writes require explicit OAuth scopes and confirmation.MIT

Planwrightofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents and humans to collaborate on local, evidence-driven planning by exposing MCP tools for plan listing and binding, workflow catalog/run operations, and task tracking with human-reviewed decisions.2AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation on either pages or variables: list/read/propose for pages, and list/get/update for variables. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
All tool names follow the consistent planist_<verb>_<noun> pattern using snake_case. Verbs are clear and specific (list, read, get, propose, update), making the naming predictable and coherent.
With six tools, the server is well-scoped for managing pages and variables. The count is within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary bloat.
The server covers read, list, and update operations for both pages and variables, but lacks any creation or deletion capabilities. This is a notable gap in the resource lifecycle, though the propose-edit workflow adds a distinct review step for page modifications.