Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to planist-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to discover, read, search, draft, and edit pages on a locally owned Bludit CMS site, with human-controlled approval and revision checks before changes are applied.
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and Cursor to discover node types, author and validate typed multi-agent workflow files, launch runs against a workspace, and retrieve run status, node outputs, and workspace change details.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects MCP-compatible AI clients to landing-page intelligence, evidence packs, improvement suggestions, experiment drafting and review, preview scans, instrumentation validation, site configuration, and integrations. Customer-facing writes require explicit OAuth scopes and confirmation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and humans to collaborate on local, evidence-driven planning by exposing MCP tools for plan listing and binding, workflow catalog/run operations, and task tracking with human-reviewed decisions.
      2
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation on either pages or variables: list/read/propose for pages, and list/get/update for variables. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the consistent planist_<verb>_<noun> pattern using snake_case. Verbs are clear and specific (list, read, get, propose, update), making the naming predictable and coherent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With six tools, the server is well-scoped for managing pages and variables. The count is within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers read, list, and update operations for both pages and variables, but lacks any creation or deletion capabilities. This is a notable gap in the resource lifecycle, though the propose-edit workflow adds a distinct review step for page modifications.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues