Skip to main content
Glama
MishaelOliva

proactive-agent-mcp

by MishaelOliva

Related Servers

Alternatives to proactive-agent-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides durable queues, human-in-the-loop approval gates, and an audit trail for AI agent fleets, enabling blocking approval requests and reliable work handoffs.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run persistent, budgeted work sessions with dependency graphs, human decision queues, required validation, and clean handoffs for autonomous or human-in-the-loop execution.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to track real-time token spend and cost velocity, automatically throttle or freeze execution when budgets are exceeded, and enforce sandbox and safety guardrails.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables governed tool-calling agents with policy decisions, optional human approval, hash-chained audit logging, and deterministic evaluation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables enterprise multi-agent decision workflows that expose 8+ MCP tools such as SQL query, web search, Python sandbox, RAG, file access, data cleaning, chart generation, and HTTP calls, orchestrated with LangGraph, streaming output, and human-in-the-loop approvals.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to resolve routine typed routing, loop-stall arbitration, and tool safety checks locally instead of invoking a frontier LLM, returning schema-enforced decision outputs and telemetry at sub-millisecond latency. Also provides reversible execution checkpoints, token budgets, and decay-based episodic memory for safe, privacy-preserving autonomous operation.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cluster into four clear domains: event-queue lifecycle (poll/complete/release/push), approval (request/verify), budget (track/set_active_session), and two standalone capabilities (compliance, RAG). complete_event vs release_event could be momentarily confused, but the descriptions clearly distinguish settling from returning to the pool. set_active_session and track_cost_budget are related but have distinct roles.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (poll_event_queue, complete_event, verify_approval_token, track_cost_budget, etc.). No mixed conventions or vague verbs anywhere in the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the sweet spot for a triage/guardrail agent, and each tool earns its place by covering a distinct operation rather than duplicating another. No bloat or thin coverage.

    Completeness4/5

    The event queue has full lifecycle coverage (push/poll/complete/release), approval has request+verify, and budget has tracking plus session selection. Minor gaps like inspecting queue depth or listing pending events exist, but agents can work around them via polling.