Skip to main content
Glama
proactive-agent-mcp

proactive-agent-mcp

by MishaelOliva

Related Servers

Alternatives to proactive-agent-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides durable queues, human-in-the-loop approval gates, and an audit trail for AI agent fleets, enabling blocking approval requests and reliable work handoffs.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run persistent, budgeted work sessions with dependency graphs, human decision queues, required validation, and clean handoffs for autonomous or human-in-the-loop execution.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to route every action through a pre-execution gate that returns allow, escalate-to-human, or deny verdicts, backed by deterministic hard-rule blocks plus probabilistic gray-zone scoring, and to run a resumable orchestration loop covering routing, quality gates, stop-loss, acceptance, and escalation. Every decision, arbitration between conflicting agents, and human approval is written to an append-only hash-chained, Ed25519-signed ledger that can be postmortemed, calibrated, alert-scanned, and exported as offline verification bundles or OTel spans.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to track real-time token spend and cost velocity, automatically throttle or freeze execution when budgets are exceeded, and enforce sandbox and safety guardrails.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows with tracked tasks, document specifications, handoffs, health gates, and server-owned evidence across providers like Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Grok Build, and OpenCode.
      29 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cluster into four clear domains: event-queue lifecycle (poll/complete/release/push), approval (request/verify), budget (track/set_active_session), and two standalone capabilities (compliance, RAG). complete_event vs release_event could be momentarily confused, but the descriptions clearly distinguish settling from returning to the pool. set_active_session and track_cost_budget are related but have distinct roles.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (poll_event_queue, complete_event, verify_approval_token, track_cost_budget, etc.). No mixed conventions or vague verbs anywhere in the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the sweet spot for a triage/guardrail agent, and each tool earns its place by covering a distinct operation rather than duplicating another. No bloat or thin coverage.

    Completeness4/5

    The event queue has full lifecycle coverage (push/poll/complete/release), approval has request+verify, and budget has tracking plus session selection. Minor gaps like inspecting queue depth or listing pending events exist, but agents can work around them via polling.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues