proactive-agent-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to proactive-agent-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides durable queues, human-in-the-loop approval gates, and an audit trail for AI agent fleets, enabling blocking approval requests and reliable work handoffs.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to run persistent, budgeted work sessions with dependency graphs, human decision queues, required validation, and clean handoffs for autonomous or human-in-the-loop execution.16MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to route every action through a pre-execution gate that returns allow, escalate-to-human, or deny verdicts, backed by deterministic hard-rule blocks plus probabilistic gray-zone scoring, and to run a resumable orchestration loop covering routing, quality gates, stop-loss, acceptance, and escalation. Every decision, arbitration between conflicting agents, and human approval is written to an append-only hash-chained, Ed25519-signed ledger that can be postmortemed, calibrated, alert-scanned, and exported as offline verification bundles or OTel spans.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to track real-time token spend and cost velocity, automatically throttle or freeze execution when budgets are exceeded, and enforce sandbox and safety guardrails.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows with document specifications, tracked tasks, audited handoffs, and server-owned health gates.29 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows with tracked tasks, document specifications, handoffs, health gates, and server-owned evidence across providers like Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Grok Build, and OpenCode.29 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
The tools cluster into four clear domains: event-queue lifecycle (poll/complete/release/push), approval (request/verify), budget (track/set_active_session), and two standalone capabilities (compliance, RAG). complete_event vs release_event could be momentarily confused, but the descriptions clearly distinguish settling from returning to the pool. set_active_session and track_cost_budget are related but have distinct roles.
Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (poll_event_queue, complete_event, verify_approval_token, track_cost_budget, etc.). No mixed conventions or vague verbs anywhere in the set.
Ten tools is well within the sweet spot for a triage/guardrail agent, and each tool earns its place by covering a distinct operation rather than duplicating another. No bloat or thin coverage.
The event queue has full lifecycle coverage (push/poll/complete/release), approval has request+verify, and budget has tracking plus session selection. Minor gaps like inspecting queue depth or listing pending events exist, but agents can work around them via polling.