mcp-feedback-enhanced
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP_DEBUG | No | Debug mode toggle. Set to 'true' to enable debug output. | false |
| MCP_LANGUAGE | No | Force UI language. Options: 'zh-TW', 'zh-CN', 'en'. Leave unset for auto-detection. | auto-detect |
| MCP_WEB_HOST | No | Web UI host binding. Use '0.0.0.0' for remote access. | 127.0.0.1 |
| MCP_WEB_PORT | No | Web UI port number (1024-65535). | 8765 |
| MCP_DESKTOP_MODE | No | Enable desktop application mode. Set to 'true' to use native desktop app. | false |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| logging | {} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| interactive_feedbackA | Interactive feedback collection tool for LLM agents. USAGE RULES:
|
| get_system_infoC | 獲取系統環境資訊 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: interactive_feedback collects user feedback, while get_system_info retrieves environment information. There is no meaningful overlap or risk of misselection.
Both names use snake_case, which is consistent. However, interactive_feedback is a noun phrase rather than a verb_noun pattern like get_system_info, creating a minor stylistic deviation.
Two tools is thin for a dedicated server, even one focused on feedback collection. The system-info tool is only loosely related to the core feedback purpose, making the set feel under-scoped.
The primary feedback collection operation is present, but there are no companion operations for session management, feedback history, or explicit completion/cancellation. The system-info tool adds unrelated functionality rather than filling lifecycle gaps.