Skip to main content
Glama
Milo0821

Zephyr Scale MCP Server

by Milo0821
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Zephyr Scale MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • zephyr-scale-mcp

      vilaabo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing test cases, cycles, and results in Zephyr Scale on self-hosted Jira. Enables AI agents to create, search, update, and delete test artifacts through natural language.
      41
      34 npm
      MIT

    • jira-mcp

      nayzo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Jira Cloud tailored for ALM projects with Zephyr Scale integration, enabling issue management, sprint tracking, and test step operations.
      259 npm
      1
      MIT

    • zephyr-squad-server-mcp

      alejandroviera
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to drive Zephyr for Jira (Server/Data Center) test management via ZAPI. It exposes operations for test cycles, folders, executions, test steps, step results, and ZQL search over stdio for use with any MCP client.
      40
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (folders, test cases, test runs, executions). There is no overlap or ambiguity; even similar tools like create_test_case and update_test_case_bdd are clearly differentiated by operation and scope.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_test_case, get_test_run, update_test_run). Names are descriptive and predictable, making it easy for an agent to infer functionality.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range but still reasonable for a test management server covering folders, test cases, runs, and executions. Each tool appears justified, with no redundant ones.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers most CRUD operations for test cases and runs, but has notable gaps: update_test_case only supports BDD content (no general update), and some operations are restricted to Cloud or Data Center. Missing delete for test executions is minor.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources