Skip to main content
Glama
Miles1994

siyuan-note-mcp

by Miles1994

Related Servers

Alternatives to siyuan-note-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to read, search, and write SiYuan notes through standard MCP tools, with read and write operations and secure authentication.
      69 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SiYuan Note that enables comprehensive management of notebooks, documents, and blocks through AI integration. It supports advanced operations like SQL querying, OCR, multi-format exports, and automated content searching for intelligent knowledge management.
      37 npm
      5
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables managing SiYuan notes via MCP: search, browse, read, and write Markdown notes with automatic bi-directional links, while restricting write/delete operations to a designated writable notebook.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a local MCP stdio server that enables AI clients to read, search, create, update, and delete notes in SiYuan through its Kernel HTTP API, with configurable notebook and tool permissions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants like Claude and Cursor to interact seamlessly with SiYuan Note through 15 specialized tools. It supports comprehensive note operations including unified search, document management, daily notes, and tag manipulation.
      43 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for SiYuan Note, enabling AI integration and smart knowledge management with note, block, search, template, export, asset, SQL, and file operations.
      37 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resource+action pairs and descriptions explicitly distinguish reading vs editing. However, delete_block (which can delete a whole document) overlaps with remove_document, and get_document vs get_block require reading descriptions to separate. These are minor and well-clarified.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Nearly every tool follows a clean verb_noun pattern (list_notebooks, get_document, insert_block, update_block, delete_block, create_document, rename_document, remove_document, move_document). The only outlier is sql_query, which is a conventional, idiomatic exception.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal range and each earns its place across document, block, search, and query operations. No redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    Document lifecycle (create/read/rename/move/remove) and block CRUD (get/insert/update/delete) are fully covered, plus search and SQL escape hatch. The main gap is notebook-level management — notebooks can only be listed, not created/renamed/deleted.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues