get_creative
Retrieve a single Meta Ads creative by its ID to access asset details for review or reuse.
Instructions
Get a single ad creative by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| creative_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve a single Meta Ads creative by its ID to access asset details for review or reuse.
Get a single ad creative by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| creative_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description implicitly indicates a non-destructive read operation via the verb 'get', but it does not disclose any additional behavioral traits such as error handling, performance, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no extraneous words, but it sacrifices parameter and behavioral details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity and lack of output schema, the description fails to explain the 'fields' parameter or the return format, making it incomplete for an agent to invoke correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no explanation for the 'fields' parameter or its possible values, leaving the agent without guidance on how to use the optional parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get), resource (ad creative), and scope (single by ID), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_creatives that return multiple items.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_creatives or create_ad_creative. The description only states what it does, not when to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Mike25app/scaleforge-mcp-meta-ads'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server