@mhdd_24/api-mocking-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to @mhdd_24/api-mocking-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables API development directly from MCP clients by creating and editing collections, running requests through the real CLI, generating documentation, and starting mock servers.52 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables instant creation of mock API servers from OpenAPI specs or natural language descriptions, with built-in fake data generation, CRUD endpoints, and configurable delays/errors for testing.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local agent interactions with a mock Study of Us API through tools for health checks, catalogs, current user info, reports, and voting.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables testing and development against a mock S/4HANA Business Partner API, exposing customer and customer address entities through the MCP protocol.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to configure and manage session-based REST and WebSocket mock servers for application development and testing. It allows for dynamic endpoint setup, request history inspection, and real-time WebSocket communication through natural language commands.8-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA lightweight mock MCP server for local testing and resilience experiments, providing predictable tool responses with simulated latency and errors.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools are clearly distinct: status is a health check, mock generates a single endpoint response, and collection generates a full mock collection. There is no ambiguity in their purposes.
All tool names share the consistent apimock_ prefix and follow a simple noun pattern (status, mock, collection). This makes the toolset predictable and easy to navigate.
Three tools is well-scoped for a simple API mocking utility. Each tool serves a single clear purpose without unnecessary bloat.
The core capabilities of checking service health, generating a single mock, and generating a collection are covered. A minor gap is the lack of configuration options (e.g., status codes or headers), but the surface is otherwise sufficient for basic mocking.