Skip to main content
Glama
Mhdd-24

ai-safety-mcp

by Mhdd-24
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ai-safety-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agentguard

      dockfixlabs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.
      2
      LGPL 3.0

    • EvalKit MCP Server

      tr4m0ryp
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables testing AI safety classifier robustness against query decomposition, obfuscation, and multi-agent attacks. Provides tools for full evaluation pipelines, query previews, and status checks.
      4
      5
      MIT

    • PromptWall MCP Server

      vtino17
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables scanning LLM prompts and responses for prompt injection, jailbreaks, PII leakage, secret leakage, and other malicious content using deterministic rules, returning verdicts and safe redacted text.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool addresses a clearly distinct activity: checking health/configuration, scanning text for issues, and generating a test suite outline. There is no meaningful overlap between these operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names share the consistent 'aisafety_' prefix and are concise, but the naming style mixes nouns (status, suite) with an action-like word (scan). 'aisafety_suite' especially omits an explicit verb such as 'generate' or 'create'.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a well-scoped count for a focused AI safety utility server. Each tool earns its place and covers a distinct core capability without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers core safety workflow needs: health check, scanning, and test suite generation. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of a dedicated tool for detailed policy management or report retrieval, but the core surface is not incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources