Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
@mhdd_24/ai-gateway-mcp

@mhdd_24/ai-gateway-mcp

by Mhdd-24
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to @mhdd_24/ai-gateway-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • GoClaw MCP Server

      nextlevelbuilder
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage GoClaw AI gateway infrastructure through a comprehensive suite of 66 tools for managing agents, sessions, and configurations. It provides real-time gateway context and guided workflows with enterprise-grade security features like audit logging and secret scrubbing.
      66
      12
      MIT

    • Azure AI Foundry MCP Server

      youssef7788
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Azure AI Foundry services through a unified interface for model exploration and deployment, knowledge indexing and search, AI evaluation, and fine-tuning operations. Supports both GitHub token-based model testing and full Azure deployment workflows.
      3
      MIT
    • Bifrost MCP Gateway

      Bifrost MCP Gatewayofficial

      maximhq
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP and LLM gateway that aggregates MCP tools behind a unified endpoint with governance, observability, and explicit execution controls.
      9,277
      Apache 2.0
    • urai-router

      urai-routerofficial

      etside
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to chat through multiple LLM API keys with automatic rotation and failover, discover free and available models, inspect key health and routing, refresh catalogues, ensure a local proxy, and generate OpenCode/Kiro/skill configuration.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools are mostly distinct: status reports health/configuration, list enumerates entities, inspect drills into one artifact, and compare contrasts two items. There is mild potential overlap between status and inspect, but descriptions are clear enough for an agent to select the intended operation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same aigw_<verb> pattern using simple, consistent verbs. This creates a predictable convention across the entire tool set.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable, focused count for a read-only gateway observability utility. It sits slightly low for a server claiming to 'manage' providers, but the count itself is not excessive or trivial.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface only supports reading and comparing gateway entities; there are no create, update, delete, or configuration-change operations. Given the 'manage' framing, this is a significant functional gap that would prevent agents from actually managing providers.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources