fusion-cad-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to fusion-cad-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents genuine 3D spatial understanding of Autodesk Fusion 360, enabling exact measurements, collision analysis, and free-space placement search, plus Fusion-native parametric authoring for clean, human-editable models.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOpen-source MCP server for controlling Autodesk Fusion 360 from any AI agent, enabling 3D modeling operations via natural language.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA remote MCP server exposing 36 Fusion 360 modeling tools over HTTPS, enabling secure remote control of Autodesk Fusion 360 with authentication, rate limiting, and audit logging.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to inspect and automate Autodesk Fusion 360 through MCP, providing tools for CAD modeling, CAM manufacturing, and document management.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD/CAM automation, exposing 84 tools for sketching, modeling, assembly, inspection, export, and G-code post-processing through any MCP-compatible client.85MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects LLMs with Autodesk Fusion, enabling CAD operations through natural language dialogue.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 75 tools
The tool set is mostly distinct: sketch primitives, feature operations, joint tools, and inspection tools each have clear targets. The main ambiguity risk is the four find_* lookup tools and the handle-based vs geometry-based fillet/chamfer variants, but their descriptions disambiguate them. No two tools appear to do the same job.
Naming is readable and consistently snake_case, but conventions are mixed: add_* for sketch primitives and parameters, create_* for sketches/joints/construction, bare verbs (extrude, shell, save, measure), and noun phrases (bounding_box, doc_state, center_of_mass). This inconsistency, especially add vs create, prevents a higher score.
75 tools is far beyond the well-scoped 3-15 range and exceeds the 50+ extreme threshold. While Fusion CAD is a broad domain, the surface is too large for an agent to navigate efficiently and includes several auxiliary meta-tools (find_api, find_pattern, find_tool, find_gotcha, screenshot_compare_with_marker) that bloat the count.
Core modeling workflows are covered: sketching, constraints, dimensions, extrude/revolve/shell/hole, fillet/chamfer, patterns, joints, measurement, export/import, and parameters. However, there are notable gaps: no list_bodies/list_joints/list_sketches, no delete_body/delete_feature/delete_sketch (only delete_construction), no create_document, and no general feature editing. The raw execute passthrough mitigates these, but the dedicated surface is incomplete.