Skip to main content
Glama
Mergoth

second-brain-mcp

by Mergoth
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to second-brain-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • moneta-notes-mcp

      ajmichels
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing fast full-text and semantic search over an Obsidian vault, plus safe structured note read and write access for Claude.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • obsidian-ai-curator

      nwant
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude AI direct access to your Obsidian vault, enabling natural language search, note creation, file management, and automated workflows.
      1,597 npm
      10
      MIT

    • Vault MCP Server

      gzlance
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Built on Obsidian Vault, this MCP server integrates with Claude Code to provide personal knowledge management including note saving, full-text search, code graph extraction, and context resumption.
      1
      -

    • obsidian-mcp

      nuuuri
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bidirectional MCP server that connects Claude with an Obsidian vault, enabling note management, full-text search, graph traversal, and daily notes operations.
      1,684 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely distinct: note operations (list/read/write/move), search, task management, and logging each have clear purposes. However, write_note overlaps with capture_thought and append_log (all write operations), and list_notes vs search_vault both retrieve note information, requiring careful reading to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_notes, read_note, write_note, search_vault, move_note, capture_thought, list_task_sections, add_task, get_tasks, append_log). Minor singular/plural variation (note vs notes) exists but the pattern is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-scoped for a personal knowledge management server. Each tool covers a distinct function within note handling, search, task management, or logging, with no redundant tools and sufficient breadth for the domain.

    Completeness3/5

    Missing delete_note and update_note (write_note can overwrite but no delete), and task management lacks complete/update/delete task operations. No way to create a new task section either. These gaps will force agents to fall back to generic write_note for editing Tasks.md, which is error-prone.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources