MemoryGuard
Related Servers
Alternatives to MemoryGuard
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that manages developer memory for coding agents, enabling shared project context, permissions, and audit trails across different agents.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceShared memory and orchestration for coding agents, enabling persistent knowledge, multi-agent coordination, and a canonical workflow across MCP-compatible AI clients.59 npm110-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to share a local-first, versioned memory of decisions, conventions, tasks, conflicts, and handoffs over MCP and REST.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP-native, local-first memory for coding agents that turns real sessions into reusable decisions, gotchas, and domain knowledge.176MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that provides a shared Markdown-based memory for AI coding agents, enabling cross-agent context persistence via tools like memory_search and memory_capture.101MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP-native, local-first memory server that gives AI agents persistent, structured memory across sessions and tools, enabling them to maintain identity and context without reconfiguration.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct role, and descriptions actively prevent misselection (e.g., memory_read vs memory_search, audit vs explain, capabilities vs invoke). The lifecycle operations also explicitly state what they should not be used for.
All tools share the memoryguard_ prefix and use readable snake_case, with memory operations following a consistent memory_<action> pattern. However, audit, explain, capabilities, invoke, and context_bootstrap deviate from a uniform verb_noun convention, creating minor inconsistency.
Eleven tools is well-scoped for a governed-memory server: CRUD/search/status, audit/explain, context bootstrap, and a capability-discovery/invocation pair. Each tool has a meaningful place and the count feels neither bloated nor thin.
The surface covers memory creation, reading, searching, updating, soft-deletion, status inspection, audit, explanation, and task context bootstrapping. Minor gaps remain around explicit lifecycle transitions (e.g., restore/archive) and applying audit repairs, though the generic invoke tool provides a partial extension path.