Skip to main content
Glama
MeilinP

alpha-lab-mcp

by MeilinP

Related Servers

Alternatives to alpha-lab-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables offline-first alpha research by providing a local stdio interface to query run status and reports, list approved method cards, execute replay runs, and stop runs, all without any submission capability.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides LLM clients with market intelligence tools over stdio, including market snapshots, price history, sentiment scoring, evidence search, and research briefs, with saved-run resource access.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to search local repositories and retrieve bounded, cited source chunks, look up full indexed chunks, and inspect index statistics through read-only MCP tools over stdio.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes a stdio-based MCP server with seven tools for running a simulated quality-orchestration pipeline, enabling pipeline execution and tracing without consuming tokens.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query, compare, and audit local profiler traces, benchmarks, memory captures, and execution evidence without uploading code or data, using CLI and MCP interfaces.
      111
      50 PyPI
      118
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic local development tools over stdio MCP, including repository mapping, code review, secret and dependency scanning, release checks, whitelisted checks, scaffolding, and workflow state tracking.
      185 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: stopping a run, reading status, rendering a report, listing method cards, or executing replay. There is no meaningful overlap; even run_status and run_report are clearly separated by output type.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the alpha_ prefix and snake_case, and most follow an alpha_<resource>_<action> pattern. The pattern is slightly weakened by noun-like action words such as status and report, but it remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped size for a focused lab-run management server. Each tool has a clear role, and the count is neither bloated nor too thin.

    Completeness3/5

    The run lifecycle is partially covered with status, stop, report, and replay execution, but there is no run listing, standard run creation, or method-card update/review operation. Agents may need external context to select or manage runs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues