Skip to main content
Glama
MehrozeKhan73

Business Central MCP Server

bc_open_page

Opens a Business Central page by numeric ID and returns its sections, fields, and actions for interactive read, write, and execute workflows.

Instructions

Opens a Business Central page by its numeric page ID and returns its complete state as a list of sections. Each section has a sectionId, kind (header / lines / factbox / subpage / requestPage), caption, and the appropriate content shape. Card-shape sections (most headers, factboxes, requestPages) carry fields[] (and headers also carry actions[]). List-shape sections (lines, list-bodied headers, repeater subpages) carry rows[] and totalRowCount. The header section adapts to its page: it is card-shape on Card pages and list-shape on List pages -- the kind stays "header" either way for path stability. This is the entry point for interactive, page-scoped work -- it returns a pageContextId that the page-scoped tools (bc_read_data, bc_write_data, bc_execute_action, bc_navigate, bc_respond_dialog, bc_close_page, bc_lookup) take as input, plus a stateVersion you can pass as expectedStateVersion to bc_write_data / bc_execute_action to guard against stale state. (bc_query, bc_run_report, bc_search_pages, bc_list_companies, and bc_switch_company do NOT need a pageContextId.) For bulk, read-only data over standard entities, prefer bc_query -- it needs no open page. Use bc_search_pages first if you do not know the page ID for an entity.

Card pages (single-record views like Customer Card=21) return one header (card-shape) plus any FactBox sections attached to the page. List pages (Customer List=22) return a header (list-shape, rows[] populated). Document pages (Sales Order=42) return a header (card-shape), a "lines" list-shape section with the document lines, and any FactBoxes.

Option/enum fields and boolean fields in card-shape sections carry two extra properties: "options" (the allowed choices as [{text, value}]) and "selectedOption" (the currently chosen entry). Always use the "value" string from "options" as the SaveValue payload when writing an enum field -- do NOT guess or invent values. Example: Item Card "Type" field returns options=[{text:"Inventory",value:"0"},{text:"Service",value:"1"},{text:"Non-Inventory",value:"2"}] and selectedOption={text:"Inventory",value:"0"}.

Typical workflow: bc_open_page -> bc_read_data (refresh / filter / paginate a section) -> bc_write_data (edit fields in any section) -> bc_execute_action (post / release / delete) -> bc_close_page. Always call bc_close_page when done. Do NOT call this if the page is already open -- reuse the existing pageContextId.

Optional bookmark parameter opens a Card page to a specific record. Bookmarks come from list rows in any prior section.

Examples:

  • { "pageId": 22 } opens Customer List. Sections: [{ "sectionId": "header", "kind": "header", "rows": [...], "actions": [...] }] (no fields[] on a list-shape header).

  • { "pageId": 21, "bookmark": "..." } opens Customer Card. Sections include the header card plus FactBoxes (e.g. { "sectionId": "factbox:Customer Statistics", "kind": "factbox", "fields": [...] }).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageIdYesNumeric BC page ID (e.g., 22 for Customer List, 21 for Customer Card). Use bc_search_pages to find IDs.
bookmarkNoOpen the page to a specific record. Bookmarks come from list row results in bc_open_page or bc_read_data.
tenantIdNoBC tenant ID. Defaults to the server-configured tenant. Only needed in multi-tenant deployments.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description fully carries behavioral disclosure. Details return structure (sections, kinds, content shapes, header adaptation), extra properties for option/enum fields, stateVersion for stale state guarding, and the requirement to call bc_close_page. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Relatively long but well-organized: begins with purpose and return structure, then workflow, parameter details, and examples. Every sentence adds value; front-loads key behavioral and usage info. Minor redundancy in examples but overall efficient for the complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description thoroughly explains return structure with examples and edge cases (card vs list pages, option/enum fields). Covers all parameters, workflow, sibling distinctions, and practical usage notes. Complete for an AI agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds meaning: explains bookmark origin from list rows, pageId numeric range and discovery via bc_search_pages, tenantId defaulting. Provides context beyond schema definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it 'Opens a Business Central page by its numeric page ID and returns its complete state as a list of sections.' It distinguishes from siblings by naming tools that do not need a pageContextId, such as bc_query and bc_search_pages. Examples further clarify the tool's role.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit workflow (bc_open_page -> bc_read_data -> ... -> bc_close_page). States when to avoid calling this tool (if page already open, reuse contextId) and recommends alternatives: prefer bc_query for bulk read-only, use bc_search_pages first if page ID unknown. Clearly distinguishes sibling tools that don't need pageContextId.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MehrozeKhan73/Business-Central-MCP-Integration'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server