MCP Browser Extension
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Browser Extension
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control and interact with a Chrome browser via MCP, providing tools for navigation, screenshots, clicking, form filling, content extraction, and tab management.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables browser control through your existing signed-in Chrome profile, letting MCP clients like Claude Code manage tabs, navigate, inspect pages, and perform real user interactions via tool calls. Works with any model backend without needing Playwright or a fresh browser profile.21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceChrome extension + MCP bridge that gives Claude control over your real browser via CDP, enabling navigation, clicking, typing, scrolling, screenshots, and JS execution with a visible cursor and tab-bring-to-front.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude to drive the user's real Chrome in the background via the DevTools Protocol through a companion extension, exposing 32 tools for navigation, form input, screenshots, snapshots, script evaluation, network and console inspection, performance tracing and raw CDP commands, with control off by default and limited by allowed sites and blocked domains.3279 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables browser automation (navigate, screenshot, click, type, etc.) for Claude Code via MCP protocol, with a Chrome extension for configuration.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to control a real, visible Chrome via MCP for navigating, clicking, typing, downloading files, and reading page content. Supports isolated CDP and everyday-Chrome extension modes with user confirmations for risky actions.19 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose, but there are clusters that could confuse: proxy_status/chrome_status/task_status all report status, and get_text/get_html/read_as_markdown/snapshot all extract page content. Descriptions do a good job of clarifying the boundaries, so misselection is unlikely but possible.
The set mixes several conventions: verb_noun (extract_links, read_as_markdown, get_text), noun_status (chrome_status, task_status), noun_verb (profile_use, task_new, tabs_list), and bare single words (batch, snapshot, storage). Readable but not predictable.
21 tools is on the heavier side but each appears to earn its place across status, profile/task management, extraction, and capture concerns. Reasonable for a full-featured browser automation surface, though slightly bloated.
Profile/task lifecycle, content extraction, and capture are well covered, but core interaction tools are absent: there is no navigate, click, type/fill, or scroll, even though snapshot/auth_check explicitly reference targeting by `ref` and acting 'after a navigate'. This is a notable gap for a browser automation server.