OpenTor MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenTor MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server for LM Studio providing Tor network tools: search Ahmia's onion service index and fetch .onion URLs through a local SOCKS5 proxy with security boundaries.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSecurity-hardened MCP server that gives AI assistants full control over your real browser session, supporting 36 tools for navigation, data extraction, monitoring, and more.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP Server that enables AI assistants to interact with your local browsers.1,537 npm54MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server for Firefox that gives AI agents full control over the browser via a Unix socket, enabling automation of tabs, pages, cookies, and more without exposing any network ports.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes Firefox browser automation capabilities through the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI assistants to control web browsers for navigation, interaction, and data collection tasks.4BSD 3-Clause

agentify-desktopofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI tools to control local browser sessions for ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI services, supporting querying, navigation, file uploads, and artifact management.35 npm564Mozilla Public 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few close pairs exist: tor_get_links versus tor_extract_threads/posts, and tor_screenshot versus tor_screenshot_element. The captcha tools also have overlapping functionality, though they differ in auto-solving versus manual reading.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern: 'tor_' followed by a verb and an optional noun (e.g., tor_navigate, tor_click, tor_list_sessions). There is no mixing of camelCase or different verb styles, making the naming predictable and uniform.
With 27 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold that the rubric marks as 'too many'. While the domain of Tor browsing is broad, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., session management, captcha handling, or extraction tools). The count feels heavy for typical MCP servers.
The tool set covers the core lifecycle of browsing: navigation, interaction, content extraction, screenshots, session management, and captcha handling. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated form submission, file upload, or element attribute retrieval tool, but these are workaroundable with evaluate_js or click/type.