No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 3 tools
line_art_prompt and build_tattoo_brief both take a tattoo idea and return text, so an agent could momentarily hesitate over which produces the AI prompt versus the human-facing brief. Their descriptions do clarify the distinction (generator prompt + negative prompt vs. structured artist brief), and check_small_size_legibility is clearly separate.
All three names use snake_case, and two follow a verb_noun/verb_phrase pattern (build_tattoo_brief, check_small_size_legibility). line_art_prompt is a noun phrase rather than a verb-led name, a minor deviation from an otherwise consistent convention.
Three focused tools fit a narrow, well-defined pipeline (idea → brief → prompt → legibility check) with no filler. It sits at the thin end of the suggested range, but each tool has a distinct role, so it is not under-scoped.
The surface covers generating a prompt, building a brief, and a size-legibility heuristic, but there is no way to refine or update an existing brief/prompt after feedback, and no style or placement reference lookup. Agents can work around this by re-calling tools from scratch, but iteration is a real gap.