Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to startup-finance-metrics

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables users to analyze their real bank, credit card, loan, and brokerage data through Plaid. It provides financial analysis tools for transactions, balances, investments, liabilities, and debt while keeping all access tokens and data locally stored.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for analyzing SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K) with industry-aware financial extraction and BERT-based NLP.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reads startup pitch drafts from Notion to provide comprehensive investor-style analysis and scoring. It evaluates key areas like market opportunity and team strength, delivering feedback through a visual dashboard.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An AI-powered financial analyst MCP server that enables stock performance analysis, company comparison, and market trend interpretation directly in your IDE using local AI.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that simulates an investment committee on your pitch materials to assess funding readiness, integrating with Obra CTO for technical evidence.
      3
      52
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides deterministic finance tools for SEC filing analysis, enabling LLMs to compute financial ratios, fetch filings, and perform equity research without hallucinated numbers.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one computes financial metrics from input data, the other generates a report from those metrics. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using camelCase: computeFinancialMetrics and generateFinancialReport. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is minimally scoped. While the tools cover the core workflow, the count is at the lower boundary of what is reasonable for a finance metrics domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover computing metrics and generating reports, but lack operations for data input management, historical tracking, or comparisons. Some notable gaps exist.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues