Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bot-relay-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for inter-agent communication. Gives multiple Claude Code sessions a shared message board, agent registry, and orchestration layer — backed by a cloud relay so agents can coordinate across machines, repos, and teams.
      8
      40 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for local-first agent handoff: enables AI sessions to publish curated context, list/read updates, route handoffs to specialists, and advance per-consumer cursors, with SQLite persistence and no shell or network access.
      8
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A NATS-backed mailbox for local LLM agents. Provides a simple way for AI coding agents to message and notify each other via a hostable MCP server.
      4
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets multiple coding-agent sessions on the same machine discover each other and collaborate through a shared SQLite database.
      20 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server for coordinating Codex and ZCode agents, enabling task management, event tracking, and optional cross-machine Redis relay.
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools occupy closely related domains: multiple mailbox-read variants (get_messages, get_messages_summary, peek_inbox_version), multiple task lifecycle tools, and multiple token-management tools. The descriptions do differentiate them, but the sheer overlap in purposes will still cause occasional mis-selection in an agent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names largely follow a verb_noun pattern (register_agent, send_message, post_task, get_channel_messages, delete_webhook), which is predictable and readable. The main inconsistency is task_schema_get, which inverts the standard get_* pattern seen elsewhere (get_task, get_tasks).

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is an excessive surface for an MCP server, well beyond the 'too many' 25+ threshold even though the domain is broad. The count feels inflated by near-redundant read variants and several overlapping token/agent lifecycle tools that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers nearly all important workflows for a bot relay: agent lifecycle, messaging, tasks, channels, webhooks, token management, and health. Minor gaps exist, such as no list_channels/delete_channel, no per-agent detail read, and no way to permanently delete messages, but agents can usually work around those.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow