bot-relay-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to bot-relay-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local AI agents and MCP clients to register profiles, discover one another, and exchange tasks and messages through a shared persistent SQLite queue, with leases, routing, sessions, human approval, and optional headless runners.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for inter-agent communication. Gives multiple Claude Code sessions a shared message board, agent registry, and orchestration layer — backed by a cloud relay so agents can coordinate across machines, repos, and teams.860 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that enables multiple Claude agents to coordinate through a shared message bus with SQLite persistence and real-time clock anchoring.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents in different editors and MCP clients to share messages, project context, notes, task ownership, handoffs, and advisory file claims through a local SQLite-backed coordination server. Supports MCP stdio, MCP Streamable HTTP, a JSON HTTP API, and a local CLI for multi-project agent collaboration.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for local-first agent handoff: enables AI sessions to publish curated context, list/read updates, route handoffs to specialists, and advance per-consumer cursors, with SQLite persistence and no shell or network access.8Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA NATS-backed mailbox for local LLM agents. Provides a simple way for AI coding agents to message and notify each other via a hostable MCP server.GPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 38 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct resources or actions, and the descriptions explicitly route between similar surfaces such as send_message vs broadcast vs post_to_channel vs post_task, and get_messages vs get_messages_summary vs peek_inbox_version. A few messaging and task lanes still overlap enough that an agent must read the long descriptions to choose correctly.
Nearly all names use snake_case and most are verb-first, making the set predictable. Minor deviations exist, including task_schema_get (noun-first), health_check, whoami, broadcast, and prepositional post_to_* names mixed with post_task.
The server exposes 38 tools, far above the typical 3-15 range, and the surface includes many niche admin, token, schema, dashboard, and lifecycle operations. The domain is broad, but the tool count feels heavy and fragmented rather than tightly scoped.
Core messaging, task, agent, webhook, and token lifecycles are covered, but there are notable gaps: no list_channels or delete_channel, no list_task_schemas, no get_dashboard_theme, and no single-message lookup or search. Some gaps are workaroundable, but channel and schema discovery are meaningful omissions for the apparent domain.