Skip to main content
Glama
MaxenLin

@maxenlin/mcp-zentao-11-3

by MaxenLin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to @maxenlin/mcp-zentao-11-3

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • @maxenlin/mcp-zentao-11-3

      CGBZNB
      A
      license
      D
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Zentao 11.x legacy instances, managing tasks, bugs, stories, and test cases, and supports retrieving comments and operation history for tasks and bugs.
      50
      17 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-zentao

      luffy-mcw
      A
      license
      D
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables reading and managing Zentao tasks, bugs, requirements, test cases, and test suites via the ZenTao 11.3 Legacy Session API. It integrates with MCP clients like Codex, Claude Desktop, and Cursor.
      48
      4 npm
      MIT

    • Zentao MCP Server

      Tytt
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Zentao bugs, requirements, and test cases through natural language interactions. It supports querying, creating, and updating various Zentao data entities including products, projects, and executions.
      5 npm
      11
      -

    • zentao-mcp

      askairo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides an MCP server for ZenTao (禅道) project management. It enables read-only queries for projects, tasks, bugs, users, and stories, and supports write operations like task assignment, progression, and bug resolution when explicitly confirmed.
      38 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    D1.3/5.0

    Scored across 48 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    All 48 tools lack descriptions, making it impossible to distinguish their purposes. Many tools have overlapping names (e.g., exportItems, exportStory, exportBug) without any clarifying documentation.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a camelCase pattern (e.g., finishTask, getMyTasks), but there is inconsistency with some using different structures (e.g., initZentao, getConfig) and several similar prefixes (export*, analyze*, generate*) that could confuse an agent.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 48 tools and no descriptions, the count feels excessive and unwieldy. For a project management tool like ZenTao, this many tools may be justifiable, but the lack of descriptions makes the surface appear bloated and hard to navigate.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set covers tasks, bugs, stories, and test cases, but critical operations like delete are missing (e.g., no deleteTask, deleteBug). Without descriptions, it's unclear if other gaps exist, but the surface seems incomplete for full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources