Skip to main content
Glama
MaxViksna

weeek-mcp

by MaxViksna

Related Servers

Alternatives to weeek-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Full-featured MCP server integrating all 71 endpoints of the Weeek API as MCP tools for AI clients, enabling task, project, and workspace management via natural language.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for the Weeek Public API. Use it from Cursor or Claude Code to browse projects, search tasks, read attachments, and (with a browser session) load task comments.
      35 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with Kaiten project management through its REST API. Enables managing spaces, boards, cards, comments, checklists, tags, and time logs.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local, read-only-by-default MCP server for Weeek that connects AI clients to your workspace over stdio, enabling listing projects, tasks, boards, members, and tags with opt-in write tools for task management.
      10
      35 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.1/5.0

    Scored across 154 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes differentiated only by numeric suffixes (e.g., weeek_attach_a_tag, _2, _3), lacking clear target indication in names. Additionally, similar operations exist for different entities (deals, organizations, contacts) without disambiguation in the tool name, forcing reliance on descriptions.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming follows a general weeek_verb_... pattern but is inconsistent: sometimes uses articles (weeek_get_a_contact) and sometimes not (weeek_get_tasks), and suffixes like _2, _3 are arbitrary. Some tools like weeek_tag and weeek_tag_list break the pattern. Overall, no consistent naming strategy across the set.

    Tool Count1/5

    154 tools is far too many for a single server. While the domain is broad (task management, CRM, etc.), the granularity is excessive; many operations could be combined via parameters. This extreme count overwhelms agents without clear benefit.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle operations for most entities (tasks, projects, contacts, deals, organizations, funnels, custom fields, etc.), including additional actions like move, attach, and archive. Minor gaps include lack of search endpoints and some missing list operations, but the core domain is well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues