Skip to main content
Glama
orcaslicer-mcp

orcaslicer-mcp

Check the profile against the printer

check_printer_match
Read-only

Checks the active OrcaSlicer profile against the printer's Klipper settings for nozzle, bed, speeds, and temperatures, returning warnings only before printing.

Instructions

Check the active OrcaSlicer profile against the printer's own Klipper settings (nozzle, bed, speeds, temperatures); warnings only.

Compares nozzle size, bed size and height, the highest speeds and accelerations, nozzle and bed temperatures, and firmware retraction against the printer's own Klipper settings. Each check comes back ok, warn or unknown with both values and why it matters; relay headline and the warnings. Warnings only: it never changes or blocks anything. Run it before printing with a new or edited profile, or when prints take longer than estimated. Klipper printers only; needs OrcaSlicer running.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "check_printer_match"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.1.17

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint/openWorldHint annotations, it discloses the result model (each check returns ok, warn or unknown with both values and why it matters), names the `headline` field to relay, and explicitly states it never changes or blocks anything. With no output schema, this carries the return-value burden well.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the purpose, then scope, then result format, then when to use. Slightly redundant: the parenthetical list (nozzle, bed, speeds, temperatures) is restated at greater length in the next sentence, costing a line without adding information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, non-mutating check with no output schema, everything needed is present: what is compared, what the verdicts mean, which field to surface to the user, and the runtime prerequisites (Klipper-only, OrcaSlicer running).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the schema to explain and no parameter-level gaps to compensate for. Baseline 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence states a specific verb and both resources (active OrcaSlicer profile vs. the printer's own Klipper settings) and enumerates the compared dimensions. It is clearly a read-only comparison check, distinguishable from physics/placement style checks by the explicit Klipper-settings scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete triggers: run before printing with a new or edited profile, or when prints take longer than estimated. It also states exclusions (Klipper printers only, OrcaSlicer must be running), though it never names a sibling alternative for non-Klipper or physics-style checks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.