Skip to main content
Glama
Mavline

DOCX MCP Server

by Mavline

Related Servers

Alternatives to DOCX MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables programmatic processing of DOCX/OOXML files through MCP, covering text, tables, images, headers/footers, structured data tags, comments, and track changes.
      29
      27 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for working with Microsoft Word documents, enabling reading, editing with tracked changes, formatting, table manipulation, comments, and PDF conversion via direct OOXML manipulation.
      37
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate, edit, validate, and render Word documents programmatically via MCP, ensuring correct OOXML structure and style.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables document conversion and processing through MCP, including Office/PDF/Markdown conversions, OCR, and PDF operations like split, rotate, encrypt, and extract.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading, writing, editing, and converting Office documents (ODT, DOCX, ODS, XLSX, PDF, etc.) using MCP tools, with no external dependencies.
      11
      32 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, editing, and validating Microsoft Word documents with specialized support for track changes, comments, and footnotes. It enables structural auditing, heading extraction, and precise OOXML-level document manipulation through natural language tools.
      100
      55
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.4/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools have distinct targets, but there is meaningful overlap between find and text_find_locations, get_text and text_runs_analyze, and find_empty_table_rows and get_table_content. The descriptions help clarify intent, but an agent could easily select the wrong tool for text or table inspection tasks.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the docx. prefix, which helps, but the naming pattern is inconsistent: some are verb_noun (list_parts, get_text), some are noun_verb (metadata_get, tables_list), and a few are bare verbs (open, save, find). Synonyms like get/list/read and set/put/write are also mixed.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 34 tools, this exceeds the 25+ threshold and feels heavy. Several tools are highly granular and could be consolidated, such as find_empty_table_rows versus get_table_content, or find versus text_find_locations, without sacrificing clarity.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers a wide range of DOCX operations: text, tables, comments, styles, headers/footers, SDT content, and validation. However, obvious gaps remain, including no create-from-scratch operation, no paragraph insertion, no table creation, and no image insertion or replacement.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues