Skip to main content
Glama
MattiooFR

Jev MCP Server

by MattiooFR
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Jev MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev

      nandansrikrishna
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.
      MIT

    • jev-mcp

      blakestone-x
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to perform typed judgments—classify, score, check, match, and screen—over closed answer sets with confidence scores, without text generation.
      7
      4
      MIT

    • jev-mcp

      arunav25
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to call TypeSafe's JEV classifier and receive structured, typed judgments with probabilities for binary, choice, and scoring questions.
      MIT

    • Prompt Compass MCP

      rishabhmpc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP clients a single decision-only tool to classify prompts as safe for local or cloud models, or as containing PII or jailbreak content, without executing actions or calling AI models.
      18 npm
      Cryptographic Autonomy 1.0 (Combined Work Exception)

    • BRAINS MCP Server

      abhishek42638
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for lead qualification, enabling evidence gathering from CRM, scoring, and knowledge base with role-based access and deterministic decision gating.
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so an agent cannot confuse it with another tool. Its name and description clearly identify it as the evaluation entry point.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The sole tool uses a clear snake_case verb_noun convention ('jev_evaluate'), consistent with a single-tool surface. No conflicting naming patterns exist.

    Tool Count5/5

    One tool is appropriate because the server is a focused wrapper around a single Jev evaluation operation. The tool is broad enough to handle classification, scoring, choice, and batch use cases, so additional tools would add little value.

    Completeness5/5

    For its stated scope—evaluating supplied text/JSON—the tool covers all core needs: multiple question types, batch evaluation, typed answers, confidence, and usage metadata. The explicit exclusions (fetching URLs, generating explanations) are outside the server's purpose, not missing features.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources