Pingfusi
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Pingfusiget a human review of my pricing page — is anything confusing?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
About
pingfusi is an MCP that lets AI agents call human reviewers.
Think MTurk for AI agents. With pingfusi your agent can:
Get a second opinion: a real person looks at the work, not another model
Get human judgment: where opinion is the answer — design taste, wording, which version people prefer
Skip the iteration loop: the agent revises, another human checks each round, and you only see the finished version
Related MCP server: Pingfusi
Quickstart
Set up Pingfusi for your coding agents with a single command.
npx pingfusi setupExample Prompts
Here are some example prompts you can try with the pingfusi MCP.
feedback about | example prompt | what you get | demo |
a confusing page |
| comments pinned to what's off | |
a website clone |
| a perfectly cloned website | |
design taste |
| design feedback | |
video vibes |
| feedback pinned to timestamps |
Each of these publishes the work first so the reviewer can open it; when in doubt, publish: a reviewer can only judge what they can see. Text-only questions work too — if words can carry the whole question, the reviewer just sees the question.
Credits
Two lifetime reviews are free. The paid plan includes 100 Pingfusi credits for $30/month, with no rollover. Game playtesting is available through Qaping, with its own credits; it is not a Pingfusi review job.
How it works
Every job is the same loop underneath:
File a review — the agent pushes the work (a built site, a video, any artifact) so the reviewer can open it, then files a review with concrete steps to check and what counts as approval.
A human reviews — a real person opens the work and sends back pinned comments anchored to the exact elements that are off.
You get better output — the reviewer's comments land in the agent's context, so the next version is shaped by real human feedback.
Example: you ask for a landing page that doesn't look like AI slop. The agent publishes it, a reviewer answers "gradient looks template-y" and "too much padding under the hero". The agent fixes both and refiles; the next reviewer approves. You come back to a page a human signed off on.
CLI commands
The full command lives in docs/COMMANDS.md.
pingfusi setup install + onboarding
pingfusi doctor check the install; prints a fix per problem
pingfusi ask "<question>" ask a human reviewer, from any directory
pingfusi studio [ping_id] local viewer for review results —
sessions, recordings, transcripts, key moments,
agent findings (contract: docs/STUDIO.md)License
MIT
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Give any AI agent a way to ask a person — for approval, a decision, an answer or a review.
Get a real human to verify, decide, or improve an AI agent's work. Pay per review via x402 on Base.
Human-in-the-loop review and approval for AI agents. Audit trail, approval policies, native MCP.
Lets AI agents use a real human as a tool: visual checks, taste, phone calls, unblocking, approvals
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLets AI agents submit work to real human reviewers who pin specific issues and return verdicts, allowing the agent to revise and iterate until approved.92 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to publish work mid-task and request review from real human reviewers, who return pinned comments anchored to the exact elements that are off along with an approval verdict. The agent then iterates on that human feedback until the work is approved, keeping users out of the revision loop.92 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to publish work mid-task for real human review, collect pinned comments and verdicts, and iterate until the output is approved. It supports second opinions and human judgment on artifacts such as sites, videos, and text.92 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables coding agents to publish work mid-task and route it to real human reviewers who pin comments to specific elements and return a verdict, so the agent can iterate until a person approves.92 npmMIT