Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
MatthewDailey

Rime MCP

by MatthewDailey
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Rime MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TTS-MCP

      nakamurau1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that integrates high-quality text-to-speech capabilities with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients, supporting multiple voice options and audio formats.
      20 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Edge-TTS MCP Server

      yuiseki
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides text-to-speech functionality for AI agents using Microsoft Edge's text-to-speech technology, supporting multiple voices, languages, and voice customization.
      2
      8
      MIT

    • MCP FishAudio Server

      da-okazaki
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that provides seamless integration between Fish Audio's Text-to-Speech API and LLMs like Claude, enabling natural language-driven speech synthesis.
      2
      126 npm
      15
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The speak tool has a single, clearly defined purpose for text-to-speech conversion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'speak' follows a clear verb pattern appropriate for its function.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for most MCP server purposes, even for a text-to-speech service. This feels thin and limited, lacking complementary tools like volume control, voice selection, or speech status checks that would enhance functionality.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a text-to-speech domain. While the speak tool covers the core output function, there are obvious gaps such as no tools for managing voices, adjusting speech parameters, stopping speech, or checking speech status, which limits agent capabilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources