Security Scanner MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Security Scanner MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to audit URLs for security headers, generate CSP Level 3 policies, compute SRI hashes, evaluate WCAG 2.2 contrast, and remediate headers.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to scan any website's HTTP security headers — HSTS, CSP, framing, COOP/CORP, and cookies — returning a score along with fix snippets.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to scan a website's HTTP security headers and receive an A–F grade against OWASP best practices, including per-header pass/warn/fail results and copy-paste fixes for missing headers.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables grading a website's security headers with per-gap fixes and a README badge, and analyzing logs, code, configs or suspicious messages to determine what happened, how severe it is, and what to fix first. Requests are masked for sensitive data and automatically retried across multiple AI providers when one refuses, subject to a defensive-use-only policy.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAnalyze and score HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, CORS, cookies) with actionable fix recommendations for web applications.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform passive security scans on domains, checking email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain-takeover risk without needing an API key.733 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools target clearly different artifacts: HTTP response headers versus a security.txt file on the domain. There is no realistic scenario where an agent would confuse one for the other.
Both names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (scan_url_security_headers, check_rfc9116_security_txt), with descriptive and predictable structure. No mixing of conventions.
Two tools is thin for a server branded as a general 'Security Scanner.' Each tool is well-scoped, but the surface feels under-provisioned for the apparent domain.
The server covers two specific web-posture checks (headers and security.txt) but omits other expected scanner capabilities like TLS/certificate checks, port scanning, or vulnerability detection. Agents can complete those narrow workflows but will hit dead ends for broader scanning needs.