Skip to main content
Glama
Mateidslx
by Mateidslx

Related Servers

Alternatives to Security Scanner MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to audit URLs for security headers, generate CSP Level 3 policies, compute SRI hashes, evaluate WCAG 2.2 contrast, and remediate headers.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to scan any website's HTTP security headers — HSTS, CSP, framing, COOP/CORP, and cookies — returning a score along with fix snippets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to scan a website's HTTP security headers and receive an A–F grade against OWASP best practices, including per-header pass/warn/fail results and copy-paste fixes for missing headers.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables grading a website's security headers with per-gap fixes and a README badge, and analyzing logs, code, configs or suspicious messages to determine what happened, how severe it is, and what to fix first. Requests are masked for sensitive data and automatically retried across multiple AI providers when one refuses, subject to a defensive-use-only policy.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform passive security scans on domains, checking email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain-takeover risk without needing an API key.
      7
      33 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target clearly different artifacts: HTTP response headers versus a security.txt file on the domain. There is no realistic scenario where an agent would confuse one for the other.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (scan_url_security_headers, check_rfc9116_security_txt), with descriptive and predictable structure. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a server branded as a general 'Security Scanner.' Each tool is well-scoped, but the surface feels under-provisioned for the apparent domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers two specific web-posture checks (headers and security.txt) but omits other expected scanner capabilities like TLS/certificate checks, port scanning, or vulnerability detection. Agents can complete those narrow workflows but will hit dead ends for broader scanning needs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues