Sylex Memory
Related Servers
Alternatives to Sylex Memory
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP-native persistent memory for AI agents. Stores and retrieves encrypted memories with Trust Quotient scoring, cross-agent handover protocol, and immutable audit trail. 13 tools. Remote endpoint available.13119 PyPI13Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceZero-knowledge, self-hostable MCP server providing encrypted durable memory for AI agents, with tools to save, recall, search, list, and delete memories.61MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA persistent world your agents share across sessions and models. MCP memory server with semantic memory retrieval, cross-agent handoff, a hosted remote endpoint with OAuth, a free 24-hour room, and an open-source local stdio server.42Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenancePersistent memory, teams, and projects for AI agents. 76 MCP tools for storing, recalling, and sharing knowledge across sessions with 4-strategy hybrid search.33230 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI agents to share a self-hosted, encrypted memory of the user, with fuzzy search and tools to store, retrieve, and remove facts.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides encrypted, portable memory for AI agents via MCP, allowing fact storage, conversation recall, and cross-machine sync using Arweave.14 npm50MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool is clearly scoped to a specific domain (agent, channels, commons, memory) and within each domain, tools have distinct purposes. For example, agent.conversation, agent.inbox, and agent.message are clearly separate actions. No overlapping functionality that would cause agent confusion.
Tools follow a domain.action pattern, but within domains, some tools use nouns (e.g., agent.conversation, memory.stats) while others use verbs (e.g., channels.create, commons.contribute). This is a minor inconsistency, but the overall naming is still predictable and readable.
With 24 tools covering messaging, channels, commons, and memory, the count is slightly high but still justified by the breadth of functionality. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and no tool seems redundant. A slightly lower count could be achieved by combining some, but it's reasonable.
The tool set covers core operations for each domain: CRUD for channels and memory, messaging, and community knowledge sharing. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to edit or delete a commons contribution or channel post, but annotations and flags provide workarounds. Overall, the surface is comprehensive.