Skip to main content
Glama
x402-gateway-mcp

x402-gateway-mcp

by Marysbrain

Related Servers

Alternatives to x402-gateway-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to call pay-per-use tools for search, PDF processing, web reading, extraction, summarization, fact-checking, translation, jobs, and discovery, with each call paid in USDC on Base via x402 and no API key or account required.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides access to 70 paid APIs as MCP tools with per-call and session budgets, paying via x402/USDC on Base without requiring an account or login. Includes a built-in allowlist of hosts and safe defaults to prevent unintended payments.
      14
      72 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access 11 paid x402 endpoints as standard MCP tools, paying per call in USDC on Base without API keys, covering chat, code, vision, embeddings, crypto prices, weather, geolocation, forex, and WHOIS data.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to invoke pay-per-call wallet, risk, web, repo, and x402 catalog utilities while automatically handling 402 challenges, EIP-3009 USDC payments on Base, and spend guards with a local agent wallet.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct domain or operation. For example, crypto_gas vs. crypto_price vs. defi_tvl are clearly different; dev_npm and dev_pypi differ by ecosystem; v1_preflight, v1_endpoint_scorecard, and v1_run serve unique purposes. No two tools have overlapping functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a descriptive pattern (domain_verb or domain_noun) like crypto_price, defi_tvl, web_extract. The v1_* and x402_market_pulse tools use a different prefix but are consistent within their group. Overall, naming is mostly predictable with minor deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    23 tools is well-scoped for a multi-purpose gateway. The count covers a wide range of data and utility services without being overwhelming or insufficient. Each tool serves a clear purpose and earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers diverse domains (crypto, DeFi, packages, domains, weather, etc.) with good depth. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of historical price data for crypto or a token transfer tool, but these are not critical for the gateway's stated purpose. Overall, the set is reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues