Skip to main content
Glama
MarventoCapital

Marvento Ads MCP

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Marvento Ads MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage Google Ads campaigns (Search and UAC) through natural language, with read tools always available and guarded write operations for budgets, campaigns, ad groups, and keywords.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage and analyze Google Ads campaigns through tools for listing campaigns, retrieving settings, performance metrics, ad groups, and running custom GAQL queries.
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to create, analyze, and optimize ad campaigns across Google Ads, Meta Ads, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Amazon Ads, and ChatGPT Ads through natural language using 400+ tools.
      105
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage, report, and analyze Google Ads campaigns securely with encrypted multi-client support, real-time API integrations, and audit trail logging.
      54 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage Google Ads accounts, covering reporting metrics like ROAS, CTR and CPC, custom GAQL queries, keyword research, and campaign management such as creating campaigns, ad groups, ads and targeting. It connects Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and other MCP clients to Google Ads data through a hosted remote server with OAuth.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous AI agents to safely inspect, optimize, and manage live search campaigns through 38 purpose-built tools covering bids, budgets, keywords, RSAs, assets, and negative keyword harvesting. Bundles two-layer Pydantic execution shields with bounded bid ceilings and fixed stepping, a preflight gatekeeper, and W3C distributed tracing that separates upstream Google Ads API latency from local execution overhead.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, from campaign lifecycle to ad group keywords, ads, assets, and search. Even similar asset tools (callouts vs. sitelinks) are clearly separated by asset type, and status/update/remove actions are scoped to specific objects.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names mostly follow a predictable snake_case pattern grouped by resource prefix, such as campaigns_*, ad_groups_*, ads_*, and assets_*. Minor redundancy like search_search and metadata_get_resource_metadata slightly breaks the verb_noun ideal but does not hinder usability.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 23 tools, the server is on the heavier side and exceeds the typical 15-tool sweet spot, but the count is defensible for a Google Ads management surface spanning campaigns, ad groups, ads, assets, targeting, and metadata. It feels broad rather than bloated, though some tools could potentially be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core Search campaign lifecycle well: budgets, campaigns, targeting, ad groups, keywords, ads, and conversion actions. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking direct asset removal/update and ad group rename, but the generic search and metadata tools allow agents to query resources and work around most omissions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive