overleaf-claude-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to overleaf-claude-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude and AI agents to read and edit Overleaf documents in real time, with support for project listing, document manipulation, LaTeX compilation, and live collaboration.97 npm24MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects Claude/ChatGPT to Overleaf projects via the Git integration, enabling read, edit, write, and file management through natural language commands.2AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables editing Overleaf projects from Claude, with tools to list, read, edit, and sync files via Git.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to read and edit Overleaf projects via the git bridge, with compile-gated writes to ensure safety.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, and compile LaTeX documents in Overleaf projects with tracked changes via the Model Context Protocol.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to read, write, compile, and download LaTeX projects on a self-hosted Overleaf instance.12 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes (listing, reading, writing, compiling), but the three compile-related tools (overleaf_compile, overleaf_compile_log, overleaf_download_pdf) overlap in that they all trigger a compile, differing only in output handling. Similarly, read_file/read_image/download_file are distinct but share a 'get content' theme, though descriptions clarify their intended use.
All tools share the overleaf_ prefix and most follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_projects, write_file, create_folder). Minor deviations exist: overleaf_current_project uses an adjective, overleaf_grep is just a verb, and overleaf_compile_log compounds nouns, but the overall style remains coherent and predictable.
With 19 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but remains well-scoped for Overleaf's functionality, covering project selection, file operations, compilation, and reporting. Each tool adds value for typical LaTeX workflows, so the count feels justified rather than bloated.
The toolset covers the core workflow of selecting a project, editing files, uploading/downloading, and compiling with log and PDF output. Obvious gaps include lack of project creation or deletion (only listing/selecting existing projects), which may limit full lifecycle management but is not fatal for editing-focused use.