Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to web-debug-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes a live Chrome browser to any MCP client through a single local endpoint, enabling real-tab control, DOM interaction, cookies and session use, network/console capture, PDF export, and CDP-powered debugging.
      28
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables Codex to inspect and interact with Chrome tabs through the Chrome DevTools Protocol, primarily for collecting authorized Brightspace course materials into local folders.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An instrumented local browser daemon MCP server that lets coding agents verify UIs in one call, with console, network, layout, accessibility, and coverage checks, plus debugging tools. It provides named isolated sessions and a CLI+MCP duality for the same verbs.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to debug and analyze JavaScript in web pages by managing scripts, breakpoints, network and WebSocket traffic, browser state, and local file inputs/outputs for continuous reverse-engineering workflows.
      24
      1,322 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Chrome DevTools Protocol-based MCP server that enables AI coding assistants to control browsers for JavaScript debugging, reverse engineering, web scraping, and API debugging.
      1,322 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct phases (session lifecycle, action, evidence capture, replay, repro record, fix verify). However, web_debug_control, web_breakpoint_set, and web_replay_seek all touch pause/step/replay state, and web_issue_capture vs web_replay_seek both deal with retained evidence, creating mild boundary ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a strict `web_` prefix plus a noun_verb or noun_action snake_case pattern (web_session_start, web_breakpoint_set, web_fix_verify), with no camelCase or style mixing. The convention is highly predictable across all 13 tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool maps to a distinct step of a debugging/reproduction workflow. No tool appears redundant or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers session lifecycle, browser actions, breakpoints, evaluation, evidence capture, replay, reproduction recording, fix verification, and framework-specific inspection. A notable gap is the absence of any breakpoint removal/listing or session cleanup beyond close, but core workflows are otherwise well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues