Skip to main content
Glama
MarkAC007

mcp-server-scf

by MarkAC007

scf_delete_evidence_file

Destructive

Soft-delete an evidence file to remove it from listings while retaining the stored object for audit and retention.

Instructions

Soft-delete an evidence file (destructive write — editor role). The record is marked deleted and drops out of listings; the stored object is retained for audit and retention.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
org_idYesOrganization UUID — obtain from scf_list_organizations
file_idYesEvidence file UUID — obtain from scf_list_evidence_files
evidence_idYesCatalog evidence ID the file belongs to, e.g. E-IAM-01

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv3.4.2

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes beyond annotations by explaining the soft-delete behavior: the record is marked deleted, drops out of listings, and the stored object is retained for audit and retention. This adds meaningful behavioral context that annotations alone do not convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with two sentences that front-load the core purpose and role, then explain the behavioral outcome. No redundant or extraneous information is present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with three well-documented parameters and no output schema, the description covers the essential behavioral aspects and role requirement. It is complete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description does not add any parameter-specific semantics beyond what the schema already provides. The parameter meanings are fully captured in the schema, so no additional value is added.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'soft-delete' and identifies the resource 'evidence file', clearly distinguishing it from other file operations like get or list. It also states the destructive write and editor role, which is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear context on when to use this tool (soft-delete scenario) and the role requirement, but does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions. The context is sufficient for an agent to select it correctly among sibling file tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools