search_fotmob

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states the basic purpose and output (IDs). With no annotations, it fails to disclose behavioral traits such as whether it returns multiple results, error handling (e.g., no matches), rate limits, or side effects. It is a read-like operation but not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that leads with the action and specifies the output. It avoids unnecessary words but could benefit from a bit more context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no annotations, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It omits usage guidelines, behavioral traits, and parameter details. An agent would need additional assumptions to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates slightly by indicating the query is a name to search for. However, it does not explain format, case sensitivity, or possible values, leaving the parameter underspecified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for names and returns FotMob IDs for teams, players, leagues, and matches. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_team_form or find_matches, which are more specific data retrieval tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, limitations, or examples of appropriate queries. The sibling tools imply context, but the description itself lacks any usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.