Skip to main content
Glama
Marcwarn

doings-evidence-mcp

by Marcwarn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to doings-evidence-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-citation-checker

      ethanchand
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that verifies whether a claim is actually supported by the source text at a given citation — independent of what the calling LLM asserts.
      MIT

    • tru8-mcp

      SamYatesSmith
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Tru8 Evidence Research that enables AI agents to submit claims or URLs and receive source-traced evidence organized by tier and type with element decomposition and relationship mapping.
      3
      MIT

    • research.md

      eidos-agi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.
      MIT

    • Grounding Enforcer

      steveswain14
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that validates model output against retrieved sources. It flags any claim, statistic, attribution, quote, or URL that cannot be traced back to a real source.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, such as critique_claim for research-intensive assessment vs. critique_org_text for user-facing text. However, can_we_say_this and make_client_safe both deal with safe wording, creating minor ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., analyze_org_argument, fetch_doings_document). Exceptions like can_we_say_this (a phrase) and think_with_evidence (slightly different) are minor deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the set covers a broad domain of evidence-based consulting without being overwhelming. Each tool addresses a specific need, from argument analysis to evidence searching.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are well-covered: claim analysis, evidence rating, internal and external searches, and text rewriting. Missing potentially useful features like document editing or report synthesis, but these are outside the stated scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources