Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to workspace-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to operate a versioned shared workspace system through standard tools, including project initialization, file operations, branching, merging, publishing, checkpoints, deduplicated storage, command execution, and background process management over stdio or Streamable HTTP.
      41
      53 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage a workspace through file reading, writing, editing, searching, Bash/Python execution, and job control, with optional desktop GUI and Cloudflare Tunnel access.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents with a durable, revision-aware project workspace for semantic context, governed source changes, verification, task checkpoints, and observability through an MCP interface.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to manage files in an isolated workspace and perform lightweight Git operations through a protected Streamable HTTP endpoint, including listing, reading, writing, searching, replacing, and deleting files plus checking status and diffs.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A desktop launcher and local MCP workspace server that enables ChatGPT and other MCP clients to securely read, edit, search, run commands, and show changes in selected local project folders.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-compatible AI, whether in the browser or running locally, to create and edit projects, run terminal commands and long-running jobs, and optionally use Docker, all guarded by a policy engine, workspace jail, authentication, and audit logging.
      23
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct operation: file read/write/edit/patch/list/grep are clearly separated, work_log is distinguished from remember/recall, and each change/task tool has a unique role. The closest pair is edit_file vs patch, but their single-edit vs atomic-multi-edit scopes are explicitly documented.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most file tools use verb_noun style (read_file, write_file, edit_file, list_files), while change and task tools reverse it (change_create, task_add, constraint_add), and standalone names appear (patch, grep, git_status). The naming is readable and grouped by domain, but the mixed verb placement makes the pattern less predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is on the upper end, but the server spans four distinct subdomains—file editing, persistent memory, git inspection, and change/task tracking—and each tool has a separate responsibility. The count feels slightly heavy rather than bloated, with no true redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The file surface covers list/read/write/edit/patch/grep but lacks a delete or rename operation, leaving cleanup workflows with a dead end. Change tracking supports create/status/document/task updates but has no way to remove a change or constraint. These are notable, work-around-able gaps rather than a total lack of coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues