mem_snapshot_list
List stored memory snapshots for a project to review its historical state and ensure continuity.
Instructions
List stored memory snapshots for one project.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_key | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
List stored memory snapshots for a project to review its historical state and ensure continuity.
List stored memory snapshots for one project.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_key | Yes | ||
| limit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description lacks details on ordering, filtering, or whether it returns metadata or content. For a list tool, more behavioral info is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks necessary detail. It is front-loaded but too brief to be fully effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and unexplained parameters, the description is incomplete. It fails to describe the return format or any operational details like pagination.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters. It mentions 'for one project' but does not describe project_key or limit, leaving the agent without needed context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and resource 'memory snapshots', and specifies scope 'for one project'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like mem_snapshot_create and mem_snapshot_restore.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like mem_snapshot_create or mem_search. The description only states what it does, without context for when to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MarceloCaporale/codex-agent-mem'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server