Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FileN-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to browse and read files, folders, photo albums, and metadata in the user's cloud drive through a read-only stdio server, including folder listing, full-text search, glob-based finding, file reading, item stats, and storage quota reporting.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to search, read, download, create, edit, organize, trash, untrash, and share files in a single Google Drive account over stdio using your own Google OAuth client.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Manage Proton Drive from Claude, Codex, VS Code/Copilot, and any MCP client through Proton's official CLI. Authentication and encrypted Drive behavior stay with Proton's tooling.
      66 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to browse, read, write, search, and share files in a pCloud account over HTTPS, including folder management, trash access, and public link creation.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local stdio MCP server that lets MCP-capable AI agents browse, search, upload, download, preview and maintain files on FTP and SFTP servers within a controlled root boundary. It keeps credentials out of the model context via OS credential storage, supports read-only modes and write gating, and stages large downloads locally with size and SHA-256 verification.
      14
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct operation, but two pairs have adjacent purposes: write_file vs upload_file (both create content) and read_file vs download_file (both retrieve content). The descriptions disambiguate them well (read_file explicitly points to download_file for large/binary files), so confusion is minor.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a verb_noun pattern (list_directory, read_file, search_files, write_file, upload_file, download_file, create_folder, delete_item). The lone exception is 'stat', which breaks the pattern as a bare verb, but it is a recognizable filesystem convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a cloud file storage server, covering listing, metadata, reading, writing, transferring, folder creation, and deletion without redundancy. Every tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    Core CRUD and transfer operations are covered, but notable gaps remain: there is no move/rename or copy tool, and delete_item mentions a trash but there is no restore-from-trash or list-trash operation. Agents can work around these (e.g. download+upload to move) but not the trash dead end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues