Skip to main content
Glama
ManpreetShuann

Bitbucket Server MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bitbucket Server MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for interacting with the Bitbucket API, supporting both Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server, enabling pull request, branch, file, code review, and search operations.
      19
      5,589
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for Bitbucket integration, providing 27 tools to manage repositories, pull requests, branches, commits, issues, and workspaces.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Cloud that exposes 35 tools covering repositories, pull requests, branching models, and pipelines, enabling AI clients to automate Bitbucket workflows.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bitbucket Server integration, enabling project, repository, pull request, source code, branch, and code review operations via the Bitbucket Server APIs.
      27
      13
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 57 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely distinct, but there is redundancy between create_pull_request (which has a draft parameter) and create_draft_pull_request; also browse_files vs list_files could confuse agents. Overall, most tools have clear boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., list_projects, get_commit, create_branch). No mixing of conventions or irregular naming.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 57 tools, the surface is overly large for a typical Bitbucket server integration. Many specialized tools (e.g., for attachments, versioned comments) contribute to bloat; a more focused set of 25-35 tools would be more appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers the core PR lifecycle, commits, branches, repos, projects, search, and comments comprehensively. Minor gaps: no delete_branch, delete_repository, or update_repository tools, but these are not critical for most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues