Skip to main content
Glama
ManiaSacha
by ManiaSacha

Related Servers

Alternatives to web-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for reading and searching RSS and Atom feeds, enabling AI assistants to fetch feed contents, search entries by keyword, and view feed metadata without any cloud intermediary.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for managing and querying RSS/news feeds, enabling real-time fetching, searching, and retrieval of feed items.
      5
      22 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables searching across multiple RSS feed sources simultaneously, with support for extensible feed sources and both STDIO and HTTP modes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Secure MCP server for RSS/Atom feed reading with SQLite backend. Enables feed management, entry search, and OPML import/export.
      17
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for RSS aggregation and LLM summarization, allowing users to fetch latest articles, search archives, and generate topic-specific digests via natural language.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for fetching, parsing, and managing RSS feeds. Features Fetch and parse RSS/Atom feeds In-memory caching with TTL Batch fetching of multiple feeds Monitor feeds for new items Search content across multiple feeds Extract and format feed content
      6
      51 npm
      12
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: feed lifecycle management, retrieval, aggregation, health monitoring, and refresh. There is no meaningful overlap between search, recent, trending, and digest—they serve different user intents.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is readable but mixes conventions: some tools use verb_noun (add_feed, remove_feed, list_feeds), while others are bare verbs or nouns (search, recent, trending, digest). Also, add_feed/remove_feed use singular while list_feeds uses plural, creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for an RSS/feed aggregator. Each tool earns its place covering management, querying, aggregation, health, and refresh without unnecessary redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core feed lifecycle (add, remove, list, refresh), retrieval (search, recent), insight (trending, digest), and maintenance (source_health). Minor gaps exist like per-feed article listing or feed URL editing, but these are not critical for the intended use.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues