Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FARPY

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Paid remote MCP for rendering hyperframe videos with structured receipts and audit logs. Enables rendering, status checking, artifact fetching, and receipt export.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographically signed, tamper-evident compute usage receipts via a Model Context Protocol server, exposing tools to record usage, verify receipts, list the ledger, and verify ledger integrity without requiring any account, API key, or single cloud provider.
      4
      12 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to run heavy computation—heat-equation solves, matrix exponentials, linear algebra, FFTs, compression, and arbitrary dispatched workloads—on their own machine while routing jobs through an automatic chooser and returning verifiable result digests with CPU-seconds and credit accounting.
      19
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create cryptographically verifiable receipts of their delegated work, with capabilities for multi-party approval and offline verification.
      11
      60 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This server enables decidable, hardware-attested semantic verification of AI outputs using on-chip ballistic walks, providing reproducible receipts that can be recomputed byte-for-byte.
      12
      345 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are distinct, but inspect and quote both create quote-like objects and both explicitly do not spend, making their boundary fuzzy. Status, download, start, and receipt are clearly separated.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are simple, lowercase, and single-word, but they mix imperative verbs (inspect, start, download) with noun-style actions (status, receipt). There is no consistent verb_noun pattern, though the names remain readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for the quote-to-receipt rendering workflow. Each tool represents a meaningful stage in the process without redundant or unnecessary surface area.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: inspect, quote, start, status, download, and receipt. Minor gaps exist such as no explicit cancel/refund flow and upload is only referenced via upload_id, but agents can work around these for typical jobs.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues