vyntryx_get_finding

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the useful fact that this is the detail-expansion step after listing, but says nothing about auth requirements or failure behavior when a uuid is unknown.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with the return payload and closed with the parameter provenance. Nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description needn't explain return values, and the read-only nature is annotated. The remaining gap is minor: no note on what happens if the finding ID is stale or from another session.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden, and it does supply the key provenance for both parameters (both come from vyntryx_list_findings). It gives no format detail for the UUID or session_id, so an agent still cannot validate inputs without trial.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource (one finding) and the payload returned (full detail, evidence, remediation), which clearly separates it from the list-oriented sibling. It stops short of an explicit verb like 'retrieve', but the intent is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It implicitly routes the agent: get the session_id and uuid from vyntryx_list_findings, then call this tool. That's a clear precondition, though there is no explicit 'do not use this to browse' exclusion or guidance on error cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.