Skip to main content
Glama
Mahender22

LegalMCP

by Mahender22
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to LegalMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • courtlistener-mcp

      Vaquill-AI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI assistants access to the CourtListener legal database (US court opinions, dockets, RECAP, PACER, oral arguments, judges) and the full eCFR federal regulations via the official CourtListener API v4. It supports bring-your-own-key authentication and is designed for use with MCP-compatible clients like Claude, VS Code, and Cursor.
      34
      4
      MIT

    • us-law-mcp

      seelpeed-debug
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for U.S. federal law that enables searching the U.S. Code, CFR, Federal Register, case law, and bills, with citation verification against primary sources to prevent hallucinations.
      11
      MIT

    • canlii-mcp

      Vaquill-AI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing AI assistants access to Canadian case law and legislation metadata from CanLII across all jurisdictions, supporting search and citation relationships.
      7
      13 npm
      6
      MIT

    • mcp-courtwatch

      haksanlulz
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for free U.S. case-law and court-docket search via CourtListener, providing tools for opinion search, docket lookup, citation verification, and more.
      10
      8 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools could be confused (get_federal_case, get_case_record, get_court_filings all provide case/docket information), but descriptions help clarify the differences. The separation between search_case_law and search_federal_cases is clear, and citation tools are distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (search_, get_, find_, parse_, list_) with snake_case. Minor deviations like get_matter_documents (which actually searches) don't cause confusion.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is slightly above the ideal range of 3-15, but the server covers three distinct domains (Clio practice management, PACER federal cases, and case law research), so each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers search/retrieval for clients, matters, federal cases, opinions, and citation analysis. Missing tools like get_client_details and full-text document access for court filings are minor gaps that can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources